"Terry will not be starved to death. Her nutrition and hydration will be taken away."

As stated by Michael Schiavo, removing her feeding tube and denying her oral food or water is not starving her to death. Can someone please explain what we would call this? He claims that his 'promise' to her is important and he wants to honor that. Can someone please remind him of his promise to love, honor and protect her until death do them part? Or how about the promise he made during the malpractice trial to care for her until death?

He is worried that 'Big Brother' is going to step in and trample her consitutional rights. What about her constitutional right to life? Where is her equal protection provided to all citizens?

Convicted criminals retain greater rights, why deny Terri? ..."But you know, it's been 15 years."

Let's talk to her family about that.